Connect with us

Legal News

Yogi Bulldozer Action: Supreme Court Issues Notice To Yogi Government, Have to Answer Within 3 Days

Published

on

1038699 up

Kamaljeet Singh – Mumbai Uncensored, 17th June 2022

Violence over the controversial statement given by former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma is not taking its name to stop. 

Let us tell you that the hearing has been held in the Supreme Court on Thursday regarding the action of the UP government. In which Supreme Court Justice A.S.A bench of Bopanna and Vikram Nath heard the matter. After the completion of the hearing, the Supreme Court has issued a notice to the UP government. 

Along with this, the court has sought a reply from the UP government in 3 days. At the same time, the Supreme Court has sought an answer from the government on the bulldozer action in UP.

In the notice, the Supreme Court has asked the government of Uttar Pradesh whether the action taken by the bulldozer has been done under the legal process or not? During the hearing, the Supreme Court clearly stated that the UP government should take any sabotage action as per the procedure of law. Apart from this, the court also said that the state should ensure security.

Referring to the reports, the court said that there are reports that these retaliatory actions are being taken, they may be right and may be wrong. If such demolition is done then at least what is being done should be according to the process of law. 

Let us tell you that the Supreme Court told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state government, that we will issue a notice, you file a reply and ensure that nothing untoward happens during this period.

It should be noted that during the hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh had started the debate. C. U. Singh argued on behalf of Jamiat. So there Singh said that the demolition process is going on in Uttar Pradesh. 

A statement is being given that they are goons, in such a situation demolition is taking place. Apart from this, he also said that continuous action is being taken in UP with the spirit of revenge. However, efforts are being made to justify it.

From CM Yogi to top police officers gave statements regarding this matter.

At the same time, the lawyer said that people are being demolished in UP by calling them stone pelters, goons. Hearing this matter, the Supreme Court said that the government will get time to file its objections. We have to ensure their safety during this time. They are also a part of the society, when someone has a complaint, they have the right to resolve it. Such demolition can take place only in accordance with the Act.

Will hear the matter next week.

Supreme Court begins hearing on a petition filed by Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind, seeking directions to the Uttar Pradesh authorities to ensure.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal News

Maratha Reservation: Navigating the Complex Path of Social Justice and Constitutional Limits in India

Published

on

By

images 1533300125082 maratha morcha1

Manak Sharma, Mumbai Uncensored, 7th November, 2023:

India’s Maratha Reservation is a difficult sociopolitical problem. India’s reservation policies have generally been the focus of divisive discussion and debate for a long time. These initiatives seek to close the nation’s social and economic gaps as well as historical injustices. The Maratha community’s inclusion on the list of socially and educationally backward classes is one such divisive reservation issue.

Historically, the Maratha community in India has experienced tremendous political and social change throughout, they have also held positions of power and influence. During colonial and post-independence times, the Marathas experienced challenges with representation and socioeconomic inequality. They started asking for reservations in government positions and educational institutions in an effort to allay these worries.

Maratha reservation supporters assert that the community has historically been marginalized and subjected to socioeconomic regression, especially in rural areas. They argue that in order to elevate the Marathas, affirmative action is necessary. Advocates draw attention to the disparities between Maratha and other communities’ employment and educational backgrounds. Social justice is one of the core tenets of the reservation system. Supporters argue that granting the Marathas a reservation would help ensure equal opportunities and make amends for past injustices. In Maharashtra, the Marathas have a long history of political influence, but they contend that reservation will guarantee their voice stays strong and relevant.

The argument put forth by opponents is that include the Marathas in the reserved group would go beyond the 50% constitutional cap on reservations. Legal problems and inquiries concerning the reservation policy in general may result from this. Opponents argue that seat reservations undermine merit-based hiring and admissions, potentially affecting the overall standards of education in public schools. Other disadvantaged classes fear they will lose their reserved seat allotment if Marathas too get in reservation list. In addition, critics contend that appropriate procedures and standards ought to be set in order for the Maratha community to recognize worthy candidates.

Election results and the political atmosphere in Maharashtra may be impacted by the Maratha reservation’s political significance. Political parties hope to gain support and influence from the Maratha community by making reservations for them. Given that the Marathas have long been a powerful political force, this action may have an impact on how political power is distributed. It might also have an impact on political parties’ alliances and electoral strategies, encouraging them to pay closer attention to the goals and concerns of the Maratha community. Therefore, the Maratha reservation has the power to influence state governance and policy, as well as change Maharashtra’s political environment.

In summary, the controversy surrounding the Maratha reservation in India serves as a symbol for the larger difficulties associated with putting reservation laws into practice. While it is true that some Maratha communities have experienced socioeconomic difficulties, the reservation debate raises difficult questions. It’s still difficult to strike a balance between righting historical wrongs and making sure that admissions and appointments are determined solely by merit. Subcategorization within the reservation framework, careful candidate selection, and ongoing assessment of the policy’s overall social effects may be the way forward.

Continue Reading

Legal News

Nawazuddin Siddiqui reached out to wife Aaliya Siddiqui for settlement; the couple finally getting a divorce

Published

on

Untitled design 3

Nomita Jeswasni, Mumbai Uncensored, 29th March, 2023:

After all the disputed happening between the couple from past few months, actor Nawazuddin Siddiqui and wife Aaliya Siddiqui are finally getting a divorce, confirms the wife. She also claimed that she will definitely fight for the kids’ custody as they do not want to live with their father. Nawazuddin also sued his brother Shamasuddin Siddiqui and Aaliya for defamation earlier this week. The actor has asked for 100 crore and a letter of apology.

Stating that she has not yet responded to Nawazuddin’s request for a settlement, Aaliya told “Divorce will happen, that’s for sure and I will also be fighting for the custody of both my kids. Nawaz has also filed for custody, but I will not let that happen. Both my kids want to stay with me and don’t want to live with him.”

Nawazuddin is a cruel and negligent father, said Aaliya, who claims that he sent away his young daughter alone with his “male manager” who hugged her “many times in an uncomfortable manner.” She also told that she was being harassed at the actor’s Mumbai residence. In relation to a property issue, Aaliya was also the target of complaints from Nawazuddin’s mother. Aaliya stated that she and their children Shora and Yaani were thrown out from the Mumbai home in March at a late hour.

Aaliya is currently staying in a rented apartment in Mumbai. She is looking for a new place to accommodate since she was asked to vacate the place by the end of the month but is unable to find a new place due to the ongoing family dispute.

In addition, Aaliya disclosed that her financial situation has prevented their children from attending school, but she has made efforts to enrol them in various classes to ensure they stay up-to-date with their education. She further shared that she intends to change her name back to Anjana Kishore Pandey after the divorce.

Continue Reading

Legal News

Legal notice to Netflix over ‘offensive remark’ made against actress Madhuri Dixit in Big Bang Theory

Published

on

Untitled design 6

Nomita Jeswani, Mumbai Uncensored, 27th March 2023:

A legal notice was sent to Netflix by political analyst Mithun Vijay Kumar for allegedly insulting Bollywood actress Madhuri Dixit in one of The Big Bang Theory’s episodes. Kumar claimed that the creators were encouraging sexism and misogyny in their work. He also ordered that the show be taken off the air for defaming the actress.

For those who are unfamiliar, Sheldon Cooper, played by Jim Parsons, compares Aishwarya Rai to Madhuri Dixit in the first episode of The Big Bang Theory. He refers to Aishwarya Rai as poor man’s Madhuri Dixit in one scene. Raj Koothrapalli, another character played by Kunal Nayyar, responds to his remark by saying, “Aishwarya Rai is a goddess, by comparison, Madhuri Dixit is a leprous prostitute.”

“It is important to hold companies like Netflix accountable for their actions and to ensure that they are sensitive to the cultural values and sentiments of the communities they serve. I strongly believe that streaming service providers have a responsibility to carefully curate the content that they offer on their platforms. It is their duty to ensure that the material they present does not include derogatory, offensive, or defamatory content. I was deeply troubled by the use of a derogatory term in one of the shows on Netflix – Big Bang Theory. This term was used in reference to the acclaimed actress Madhuri Dixit, and it was not only offensive and deeply hurtful but also showed a lack of regard for her dignity.” said Mithun Kumar in a statement

“I strongly believe that streaming service providers must take such issues seriously and act quickly to address any instances of offensive or defamatory content. Furthermore, streaming service providers should be proactive in preventing such content from being streamed. This can be achieved through clear guidelines and rigorous screening processes for all the content published. Ultimately, streaming services have a significant influence over the content that is consumed by millions of individuals, and with this influence comes a responsibility to ensure that the content they offer is respectful, inclusive, and free from harmful stereotypes. I hope that this incident will serve as a wake-up call to all streaming services providers to work towards creating a more equitable and respectful media landscape,” he concluded.

Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady’s CBS sitcom The Big Bang Theory started in 2007. The show also starred Kaley Cuoco, Johnny Galecki, Simon Helberg, Mayim Bilaik, and other actors. 2019 saw the airing of the final episode.

Continue Reading

Trending