Connect with us

Legal News

Disputed Supreme Court’s order on salaries to Imams is a betrayal to other religious sects: CIC

Published

on

Untitled design 1

Khushi Thawani, 12th December 2022, Mumbai Uncensored:

The highest entity to handle complaints under the RTI Act is the Central Information Commission, and in one of the recent applications, activist Subhash Agrawal submitted an RTI request asking about the salaries paid to imams and muezzins after receiving no response from the Delhi government and Delhi Waqf Board.

Imams filed a petition in All India Iman organization and others v. Union of India and others, 1993, to protect their fundamental rights against exploitation by wakf boards. They based their argument on the discrepancy between the nature of the task and the compensation. And the highest court in the land commanded the Wakf Board to pay the Imams desirable renumeration.

The judgement is clearly a per incurium as it was in violation of the Article 27 of the Indian Constitution, which clearly states that the country does not support any particular religion and shall not be benefitted from the public fund. As India was carved out of a bigger landmass after being divided because of religious clash, it decided to remain a secular country following the principle of Vasudhev Kutumbakam.

CIC commissioner Uday Mahurkar noted that, “The said judgment sets a wrong precedent in the country and has become a point of unnecessary political slugfest and also social disharmony in the society”.

He directed the Delhi Waqf board to compensate RTI activist Subhash Agrawal with Rs. 25,000 to cover his legal expenses and the time he lost looking for an answer to the application. Both the Delhi Wakf Board and the Delhi government provided the activist with unsatisfactory responses.

The abovementioned judgement allowing renumeration to Imams and Muezzins is “not just betraying the Hindu community and members of other non-Muslim minority religions, but also encouraging pan-Islamist tendencies amongst a section of Indian Muslims which are already visible”, the commissioner said.

He revealed that while the Delhi Waqf Board (DWB) receives an annual payment of roughly Rs. 62 crores from the Delhi government, its own income from various sources is just about Rs. 30 lakhs.

Mahurkar said those who justify such steps in the name of protection to religious minorities raise a question that if a particular religious minority has a right to protection, the majority community too has a right to protection in a multi-religious country where it is incumbent that the rights of the members of all religions are protected equally in the interest of inter-faith harmony and unity of the nation.

While dealing with the dispute the commission observed “The monthly honorarium of Rs 18,000 and Rs 16,000 being given to the Imams and Muezzins of Delhi Waqf Board mosques in Delhi is being paid by the Delhi Government virtually from the tax payers money which in turn is in sharp contrast with the example quoted by the appellant in which the priest of a Hindu temple is getting a paltry of Rs. 2000/- per month.

The commission directed that a copy of the order be forwarded to the Union Minister of Law with a recommendation to take appropriate action enforcing Articles 25–28, which will further set an example of equality among all the religious segments of society. The commission did this while keeping the Constitution of India in mind and its secular nature.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal News

Maratha Reservation: Navigating the Complex Path of Social Justice and Constitutional Limits in India

Published

on

By

images 1533300125082 maratha morcha1

Manak Sharma, Mumbai Uncensored, 7th November, 2023:

India’s Maratha Reservation is a difficult sociopolitical problem. India’s reservation policies have generally been the focus of divisive discussion and debate for a long time. These initiatives seek to close the nation’s social and economic gaps as well as historical injustices. The Maratha community’s inclusion on the list of socially and educationally backward classes is one such divisive reservation issue.

Historically, the Maratha community in India has experienced tremendous political and social change throughout, they have also held positions of power and influence. During colonial and post-independence times, the Marathas experienced challenges with representation and socioeconomic inequality. They started asking for reservations in government positions and educational institutions in an effort to allay these worries.

Maratha reservation supporters assert that the community has historically been marginalized and subjected to socioeconomic regression, especially in rural areas. They argue that in order to elevate the Marathas, affirmative action is necessary. Advocates draw attention to the disparities between Maratha and other communities’ employment and educational backgrounds. Social justice is one of the core tenets of the reservation system. Supporters argue that granting the Marathas a reservation would help ensure equal opportunities and make amends for past injustices. In Maharashtra, the Marathas have a long history of political influence, but they contend that reservation will guarantee their voice stays strong and relevant.

The argument put forth by opponents is that include the Marathas in the reserved group would go beyond the 50% constitutional cap on reservations. Legal problems and inquiries concerning the reservation policy in general may result from this. Opponents argue that seat reservations undermine merit-based hiring and admissions, potentially affecting the overall standards of education in public schools. Other disadvantaged classes fear they will lose their reserved seat allotment if Marathas too get in reservation list. In addition, critics contend that appropriate procedures and standards ought to be set in order for the Maratha community to recognize worthy candidates.

Election results and the political atmosphere in Maharashtra may be impacted by the Maratha reservation’s political significance. Political parties hope to gain support and influence from the Maratha community by making reservations for them. Given that the Marathas have long been a powerful political force, this action may have an impact on how political power is distributed. It might also have an impact on political parties’ alliances and electoral strategies, encouraging them to pay closer attention to the goals and concerns of the Maratha community. Therefore, the Maratha reservation has the power to influence state governance and policy, as well as change Maharashtra’s political environment.

In summary, the controversy surrounding the Maratha reservation in India serves as a symbol for the larger difficulties associated with putting reservation laws into practice. While it is true that some Maratha communities have experienced socioeconomic difficulties, the reservation debate raises difficult questions. It’s still difficult to strike a balance between righting historical wrongs and making sure that admissions and appointments are determined solely by merit. Subcategorization within the reservation framework, careful candidate selection, and ongoing assessment of the policy’s overall social effects may be the way forward.

Continue Reading

Legal News

Nawazuddin Siddiqui reached out to wife Aaliya Siddiqui for settlement; the couple finally getting a divorce

Published

on

Untitled design 3

Nomita Jeswasni, Mumbai Uncensored, 29th March, 2023:

After all the disputed happening between the couple from past few months, actor Nawazuddin Siddiqui and wife Aaliya Siddiqui are finally getting a divorce, confirms the wife. She also claimed that she will definitely fight for the kids’ custody as they do not want to live with their father. Nawazuddin also sued his brother Shamasuddin Siddiqui and Aaliya for defamation earlier this week. The actor has asked for 100 crore and a letter of apology.

Stating that she has not yet responded to Nawazuddin’s request for a settlement, Aaliya told “Divorce will happen, that’s for sure and I will also be fighting for the custody of both my kids. Nawaz has also filed for custody, but I will not let that happen. Both my kids want to stay with me and don’t want to live with him.”

Nawazuddin is a cruel and negligent father, said Aaliya, who claims that he sent away his young daughter alone with his “male manager” who hugged her “many times in an uncomfortable manner.” She also told that she was being harassed at the actor’s Mumbai residence. In relation to a property issue, Aaliya was also the target of complaints from Nawazuddin’s mother. Aaliya stated that she and their children Shora and Yaani were thrown out from the Mumbai home in March at a late hour.

Aaliya is currently staying in a rented apartment in Mumbai. She is looking for a new place to accommodate since she was asked to vacate the place by the end of the month but is unable to find a new place due to the ongoing family dispute.

In addition, Aaliya disclosed that her financial situation has prevented their children from attending school, but she has made efforts to enrol them in various classes to ensure they stay up-to-date with their education. She further shared that she intends to change her name back to Anjana Kishore Pandey after the divorce.

Continue Reading

Legal News

Legal notice to Netflix over ‘offensive remark’ made against actress Madhuri Dixit in Big Bang Theory

Published

on

Untitled design 6

Nomita Jeswani, Mumbai Uncensored, 27th March 2023:

A legal notice was sent to Netflix by political analyst Mithun Vijay Kumar for allegedly insulting Bollywood actress Madhuri Dixit in one of The Big Bang Theory’s episodes. Kumar claimed that the creators were encouraging sexism and misogyny in their work. He also ordered that the show be taken off the air for defaming the actress.

For those who are unfamiliar, Sheldon Cooper, played by Jim Parsons, compares Aishwarya Rai to Madhuri Dixit in the first episode of The Big Bang Theory. He refers to Aishwarya Rai as poor man’s Madhuri Dixit in one scene. Raj Koothrapalli, another character played by Kunal Nayyar, responds to his remark by saying, “Aishwarya Rai is a goddess, by comparison, Madhuri Dixit is a leprous prostitute.”

“It is important to hold companies like Netflix accountable for their actions and to ensure that they are sensitive to the cultural values and sentiments of the communities they serve. I strongly believe that streaming service providers have a responsibility to carefully curate the content that they offer on their platforms. It is their duty to ensure that the material they present does not include derogatory, offensive, or defamatory content. I was deeply troubled by the use of a derogatory term in one of the shows on Netflix – Big Bang Theory. This term was used in reference to the acclaimed actress Madhuri Dixit, and it was not only offensive and deeply hurtful but also showed a lack of regard for her dignity.” said Mithun Kumar in a statement

“I strongly believe that streaming service providers must take such issues seriously and act quickly to address any instances of offensive or defamatory content. Furthermore, streaming service providers should be proactive in preventing such content from being streamed. This can be achieved through clear guidelines and rigorous screening processes for all the content published. Ultimately, streaming services have a significant influence over the content that is consumed by millions of individuals, and with this influence comes a responsibility to ensure that the content they offer is respectful, inclusive, and free from harmful stereotypes. I hope that this incident will serve as a wake-up call to all streaming services providers to work towards creating a more equitable and respectful media landscape,” he concluded.

Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady’s CBS sitcom The Big Bang Theory started in 2007. The show also starred Kaley Cuoco, Johnny Galecki, Simon Helberg, Mayim Bilaik, and other actors. 2019 saw the airing of the final episode.

Continue Reading

Trending